City of South San Francisco header
File #: 23-366    Name:
Type: Resolution Status: Passed
File created: 4/25/2023 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/10/2023 Final action: 5/10/2023
Title: Resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco to Comply with State Housing Laws per OBAG 3 Grant Requirements.
Related files: 22-694, 23-365
Title
Resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco to Comply with State Housing Laws per OBAG 3 Grant Requirements.




body
WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco is a municipal corporation and general law city duly organized and existing under and pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of California ("City"), located in the San Francisco Bay Area; and

WHEREAS, the San Francisco region has the highest housing costs in the United States; and
WHEREAS, the Bay Area produced less than 30% of the need for low- and moderate-income housing units from 2007-2014, and is on track to similarly underproduce low-income units during the 2015-2023 time period; and
WHEREAS, there are limited funding sources available to secure land for the construction of low- and moderate-income housing; and
WHEREAS, public lands can play a critical role in increasing the supply of land for affordable housing;
WHEREAS, accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and junior accessory dwelling units (JADUs) provide an important option to increase the availability and affordability of housing, especially in existing, lower density neighborhoods; and
WHEREAS, density bonuses are an effective tool to increase the financial feasibility of housing and incentivize the creation of affordable housing; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission adopted Resolution No. 4505, outlining the programming policy and project selection criteria for the One Bay Area Grant Program (OBAG 3), including certain requirements to access these funds;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, State of California hereby finds, determines, and resolves as follows:
1. The City Council has considered the full record before it, which may include but is not limited to such things as the staff report, testimony by staff and the public, and other materials and evidence submitted or provided to it. Furthermore, the recitals set forth above are fo...

Click here for full text