City of South San Francisco header
File #: 22-902    Name:
Type: Staff Report Status: Public Hearing
File created: 10/24/2022 In control: Planning Commission
On agenda: 11/3/2022 Final action:
Title: Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council determine that the environmental effects of the proposed Oyster Point Hotel at 367 Marina Boulevard in the Oyster Point Specific Plan Area is consistent with the adopted Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR and would not necessitate the need for preparing a subsequent environmental document pursuant to the criteria of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168, and is eligible for streamlining per CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.
Attachments: 1. Exhibit A - Environmental Checklist, 2. Exhibit B - MMRP OP Hotel, 3. Exhibit C - 2011 Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR
Related files: 22-900
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.

Title

Resolution making findings and recommending that the City Council determine that the environmental effects of the proposed Oyster Point Hotel at 367 Marina Boulevard in the Oyster Point Specific Plan Area is consistent with the adopted Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR and would not necessitate the need for preparing a subsequent environmental document pursuant to the criteria of CEQA Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168, and is eligible for streamlining per CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.

 

body

WHEREAS, Oyster Point Holdco, LLC (“Applicant”) has proposed construction of an approximately 261,00 square foot hotel. An additional 14,200 square feet of building space is anticipated as a future expansion phase to include an event ballroom and additional meeting space for a total square footage of 275,200 at 367 Marina Boulevard (“Project Site”); and

 

WHEREAS, the proposed Project is located within the Oyster Point Specific Plan (OPSP) zoning district; and

 

WHEREAS, the applicant seeks approval of a Design Review (DR22-0005), Use Permit (UP22-0001), Development Agreement (DA22-0001) and Transportation Demand Management Plan (TDM22-0006) for the Project; and

 

WHEREAS, approval of the applicant’s proposal is considered a “project” for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§21000, et seq.) (“CEQA”); and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Oyster Point Specific Plan in 2011, which articulates the vision for growth and development throughout Oyster Point; and

 

WHEREAS, the City Council certified the Oyster Point Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) in March, 2011 (State Clearinghouse number 2010022070) in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, which analyzed the potential environmental impacts of the development of Oyster Point; and

 

WHEREAS, the City and applicant prepared an environmental checklist for the Project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(4). Such environmental checklist concluded that per CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 and CEQA Guidelines 15162, the Project is within the scope of the Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR and development of the Project does not require the preparation of an additional environmental document; and

 

WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines section 15183 provides that projects consistent with the development density established by existing zoning policies or community plan for which an EIR was certified shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project- specific significant effects that are peculiar to the project or its site. The environmental checklist also demonstrates that the proposed project qualifies for streamlining under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 as there are no project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.

 

WHEREAS, on November 3, 2022, the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the proposed entitlements and environmental effects of the Project and take public testimony; and

 

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission exercised its independent judgment and analysis, and considered all reports, recommendations, and testimony before making a determination on the Project.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it, which includes without limitation, the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§21000, et seq.) (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations §§15000, et seq.); the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR; the Oyster Point Specific Plan, and the Oyster Point Specific Plan Program EIR; the Oyster Point Hotel Environmental Checklist, all site plans, and all reports, minutes, and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed November 3, 2022 meeting; and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code Sections 21080(e) and 21082.2), the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby finds as follows:

 

SECTION 1                     FINDINGS

 

A.                     General Findings

1.                     The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution.

 

2.                     Exhibit A attached to this Resolution, The Oyster Point Hotel Project Environmental Checklist, is incorporated by reference and made a part of this Resolution, as if set forth fully herein.

 

3.                     The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, and in the custody of the Chief Planner, Tony Rozzi.

 

B.                     CEQA Findings

1.                     For the reasons stated in this Resolution, there is not substantial evidence in the record to support a fair argument that approval of the Project will result, as contemplated in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, in significant environmental effects beyond those adequately evaluated and addressed by the Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR nor are there new or alternative mitigation measures that the applicant declines to impose. Therefore, the Project is within the scope of the Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR and may be used for this later activity pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168 because the Project is a subsequent project within the scope of the Project Description as analyzed in the Program EIR for the 2011 Oyster Point Specific Plan. All applicable regulations and mitigation measures (Exhibit B) identified in the 2011 Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR will be applied to the Project or otherwise made conditions of approval of the Project.

 

2.                     For the reasons stated in this Resolution, the proposed Project is consistent with the development density established by existing zoning, community plan, or general plan policies for which an EIR was certified and therefore, the Project does not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. The environmental checklist demonstrates that the proposed project qualifies for streamlining under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, as there are no project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. 

 

SECTION 2                     DETERMINATION

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby makes the findings contained in this Resolution and recommends that the City Council make a determination that the environmental effects of the proposed Project were sufficiently analyzed under the 2011 Oyster Point Specific Plan EIR (EIR) pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Sections 15162 and 15168 and no additional environmental review is required. The environmental checklist also demonstrates that the proposed project qualifies for streamlining under CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, as there are no project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site. 

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.

 

*                     *                     *                     *                     *                     *                     *