Legislation Details

File #: 26-1751    Name:
Type: Staff Report Status: Public Hearing
File created: 4/23/2026 In control: City Council
On agenda: 5/13/2026 Final action:
Title: Report regarding a resolution approving proposed changes to the Master Fee Schedule for the Fiscal Year 2026-27. (Christie Donnelly, Finance Director)
Attachments: 1. 2026.05.13 Presentation to City Council v4
Date Ver.Action ByActionResultAction DetailsMeeting DetailsVideo
No records to display.
Title
Report regarding a resolution approving proposed changes to the Master Fee Schedule for the Fiscal Year 2026-27. (Christie Donnelly, Finance Director)
label
RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation
Staff recommends that the City Council (1) hold a public hearing to receive input regarding the adoption of proposed updates to the City of South San Francisco Master Fee Schedule; and (2) at the conclusion of the public hearing, consider adopting a resolution approving updates to the City of South San Francisco Master Fee Schedule.

Body
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
Tax revenues support City services such as public safety, streets, and other infrastructures. Discretionary services that benefit a specific user group (rather than the entire community) are funded in whole, or part, by user fees. Under state law, public agencies, like the City of South San Francisco, are permitted to recover the costs associated with providing certain services considered to be a "personal choice" or "user fees." Any amount not covered by user fees is then subsidized by General Fund tax dollars or other available sources. Such services are provided to a specific customer for their singular benefit. Some examples of those services are building permits or commercial film permit fees, which benefit the individual and not the community.
By law, most user fees may not exceed the reasonable cost of the service. Propositions 218 and 26 amended Article XIIIC of the California Constitution to require that user fees be limited to the City's reasonable cost of providing the service or benefit. The City Council can set fees by a simple majority vote. Subject to other exceptions in Article XIIIC and XIIID, a fee for service that exceeds the reasonable cost of providing the service or benefit becomes a tax, which requires a vote of the electorate. Cities perform periodic studies to assess their costs of providing services before increasing existing fees or adopting new fees. The purpose of a cost of service...

Click here for full text